The article "is Mideast peace possible?" is about whether or not the countries in the middle east will decide on peace. There are two authors of this article the first one is Dennis Ross who believes that it is possible, and Aaron David Miller the second author does not think so. I agree partially with both sides of the argument but in the end I do believe that it can end in peace.
There are many reasons why someone may think that Mideast peace is not possible. According to Aaron David Miller "The truth is that neither Israeli or Palestinian leaders are prepared to own their negotiations to end the conflict as much as they need to." This shows that neither side will admit that they are wrong and will continue fighting until the end of their enemy. This also shows why many people have the opinion that it cannot end and peace and why they think it will end in the destruction of one country or another.
There are multiple examples of why I think that they may decide on peace. According to Dennis Ross "so long as these two distinct national peoples live next to each other, they will have to find a way to peacefully coexist." This supports my opinion, Dennis Ross', and many other peoples opinion that although neither side will back down they will still have do compromise unless they want to destroy their own country which will then force them to submit into peace.
This article has made me think that in any rough situation peace is possible and although compromise can be hard it is still always an option. I have also learned that there are many different opinions on this topic and that not everyone will agree on mine in particular. These are the different things that I have taken away from the article "Is Mideast peace possible" by Dennis Ross and Aaron David Miller.
No comments:
Post a Comment